Thanks a lot for integrating this feature!
Why did you overload the already existing evaluate function? Wouldn't it be better to create a new function called "function" as the commandline-switch "function" in convert.exe coexists to evaluate? (what a weird sentence but that's correct in this case)
In my opinion this would be a better and consistent way.
Why did you overload the already existing evaluate function? Wouldn't it be better to create a new function called "function" as the commandline-switch "function" in convert.exe coexists to evaluate? (what a weird sentence but that's correct in this case)
In my opinion this would be a better and consistent way.